True Zero Block
The Blank Protocol: Achieving True Zero-Block Execution
The Market Illusion: Unpacking Competitors' "Zero-Block" Claims
In the competitive landscape of Solana onchain trading, the term "zero-block" has become a prevalent but often misleading claim. While numerous platforms advertise this level of performance, a closer look at their underlying architecture reveals critical technical limitations that make such speeds inconsistent at best.
Most platforms fail to deliver true 'zero block' speed because their reliance on third-party turnkey solutions and signing services creates hidden latency. This makes their automation slow and unreliable.
We solved this by building our entire infrastructure in-house.
Our platform delivers consistency on every action, from quick buys to automated swaps, ensuring flawless performance even during peak congestion. By using our own ultra-fast signing system (4-8ms), we eliminate the critical delays common elsewhere. This gives us the end-to-end control needed for both consistent manual trading and truly reliable, high-speed automation.
The fundamental issue lies in the widespread reliance on Turnkey Solutions and Generic API Endpoints.
The Inherent Latency of APIs and Turnkey Infrastructure: Most platforms are assembled using generic, third-party services. This means a user's trade must pass through a series of external APIs and servers not owned by the platform. Each of these additional "hops" in the communication chain introduces unavoidable latency, which creates a significant challenge for guaranteeing next-block execution.
Lack of End-to-End Control: A platform built on turnkey has no direct control over transaction prioritization or network routing. They are subject to the traffic, limitations, and potential points of failure of the third-party services they depend on. They cannot optimize the full data pipeline for speed because they only control a small portion of it. Other platforms are claiming "zero-block" are promising high speed while they rely on slow, public systems that they don't control.
The Absence of Verifiable Proof
The most telling sign of an unsubstantiated claim is the lack of transparent, real-time proof. Platforms that make bold performance claims without a public, verifiable method to audit their execution speeds are relying on marketing, not engineering.
But proof without consistency is just a gimmick. Showcasing a single, 'perfect' zero-block transaction during a quiet moment means nothing. True performance is about delivering speed reliably on every single trade, especially when the network is congested. They won't show you the on-chain data for all their trades the submission timestamp vs. the confirmation timestamp because it would expose the architectural delays and inconsistencies they cannot avoid.
DebunkAt Blank, we have engineered our entire stack, from our direct validator connections to our predictive fee engine, for the sole purpose of achieving True Zero Block Execution. Our claims are not abstract; they are backed by the verifiable, on-chain analytics provided to every user. While other platforms are marketing a myth, We can prove our performance and deliver.
Last updated